|
Neil LaBute
You might not guess
it from his plays, but thirty-nine-year old Neil LaBute is a
mild-mannered, practicing Mormon and the father of two. Growing up
in a blue-collar family in the lumber town of Spokane, Washington,
LaBute notes of the teen-agers at his high school, “I wasn’t one
of them myself, but I went to school with kids like Darrell and
Tim.” The new play, he notes, “touches on, not necessarily my own
life, but the people I grew up around.”
To earn money in this environment, LaBute worked as a grocery
clerk, a loader of boxcars, a security guard, an attendant at a
mental hospital, and a teacher. His father, with whom he was not
on the best of terms, was a truck driver, who, like the father in
The Glass Menagerie, ”fell in love with long distances.”
His father’s volatile temper was expressed in words rather than in
actions, giving LaBute an indication of “how damage could be done
with language. I would feel the brunt of it less than my
brother. But I was a keen observer and I’m sure that’s peppered
the way I often write.”
When he was a
teen-ager, he received a scholarship to Brigham Young University
in Utah, where the student body was 97 per cent Mormon. This led
him to join the Mormons, finding it “comforting” in its teachings
and structure. “I was probably at that young an age looking for
something, and it certainly fit what I was looking for. And it
still does.” His wife Lisa, a psychotherapist, is a Mormon, as are
their son and daughter. His directing teacher at Brigham Young,
Charles Metten, sees LaBute as “a young Ibsen.”
The writer who has had the greatest influence on LaBute is David
Mamet. His admiration for Mamet is great: “beyond fan – stalker
perhaps. Psychological stalker.” While at Brigham Young, he
staged an expurgated version of Mamet’s “Sexual Perversity in
Chicago,” not exactly a title or a play, for that matter, that
would appeal to Mormons. But the poster advertising it was so
rococo, he recalls, that no one could read it. His dialogue, like
Mamet’s, is sharp, short, staccato, repetitious, and filled with
expletives. It also is brilliantly character-revealing
“The Distance from
Here” is his third play to premiere at the Almeida, and the second
at their theater at King’s Cross in a transformed bus garage. In
2001, “The Shape of Things” was a sell-out hit, with Rachel Weisz
portraying a manipulative graduate student who exploits an
undergraduate (Paul Rudd) and his love for her by coldly
transforming him into her degree art project. In “Bush,” Mormons
are depicted as homophobes, which led to his being called before a
Church committee. “I had to go in front of these fifteen guys in
suits and I was disfellowshipped – not excommunicated, which is
the next stage,” recalls LaBute.
As is Mamet, LaBute
is a film writer and director as well. He had to self-finance his
first film, “In the Company of Men,” borrowing $25,000 from
friends. It has become a cult classic, treating two corporate
yuppies who wager that they can “hurt somebody.” They manipulate
a beautiful deaf secretary into falling in love with them
separately, after which they both dump her.
“Your Friends and Neighbors” was his next film, treating six late
twenty-somethings, none of whom has any redeeming features. Their
conversation is Mamet-like, as demonstrated by Cary in his
telephone conversation. A phrase that keeps coming up in the play
is “Is it me?” Says LaBute, “These men were constantly asking,
without any sense of wanting to know the answer, ‘Who’s doing
this?’” The repetition of phrases like “You know” and “Listen” or
“I’m with you” LaBute sees as “a false sense of warmth in the way
we lead people in sentences.”
He next directed
“Nurse Betty,” and has filmed his play “The Shape of Things.” His
latest project is writing the screenplay of A.S. Byatt’s novel
“Possession,” which stars Gwyneth Paltrow and Jeremy Northam as
academics who fall in love when researching the secret romance
between two Victorian poets.
Having loved writing
since he was five, LaBute notes that writing is “my job. That’s
what I do. It’s also what I love. I love to do it and so I do
it. I do it because I can, I do it well, and I do it better than
I do anything else. . . .Who could’ve imagined that one day I
could receive money for making up stories? Not me.”
|